LOL.hint, I asked Chat GPT, so don't think I know anything,
Thanks, my experience with that tool is it produces stuff with all the right words and sounds like it really knows what it is talking about but is generally complete BS.
Just out of curiosity I went to see what it could come up with for getting an ISR to run on core1 on rp2040. Its first reply was a polling solution. After three attempts which did not respond to the question I was asking, I invited it to do something what will probably not pass the forum filter if I repeat it here.
A few months ago I tested its knowledge of El Nino and ENSO. Similar result. Lots of stuff with all the right jargon which sounded very convincing unless you know some basic physics and climatology and realise its conclusions are back to front. Each time I corrected it, it had another go. After 5 incorrect answers, I told it I had no reason to listen to any future replies since it had just been wrong 5/5. It politely thanked me for helping it improve its answers and said it would try to do better next time !
Word probability algos may not be the best way to do science. IMO we are not redundant just yet.
Statistics: Posted by pie_face — Thu Oct 03, 2024 10:27 pm